<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Three Blue Tear Drops Forums - All Forums]]></title>
		<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Three Blue Tear Drops Forums - http://threeblueteardrops.com]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:24:24 -0500</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A different type of power plant]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3129</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:15 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3129</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Gadgets and Tech, GreenTechAs solar technology continues to make gains in efficiency and affordability, designers are starting to take on the next challenge in the evolution of solar technology: how to make it aesthetic, or at least inconspicuous. While many are solving that problem by integrating solar panels into poolside furniture and ladies undergarments, a consortium of designers in Japan are taking a more functional approach: solar leaves.While they don't seem to have the art of camouflage perfected quite yet (it looks like a bad silk ficus), these thin-film solar leaves are designed to blend into other foliage, grabbing maximum sunlight without spoiling your view. This prototype -- designed by Japan's National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Mitsubishi, and Tokki Corp -- gives us an idea of the wide variety of forms that thin-film technology is allowing solar systems to take. Each leaf on this solar power plant is coated with its own protective film that will allow it to stand up to the elements.[via Engadget]&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383533729/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/a-d.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Gadgets and Tech, GreenTechAs solar technology continues to make gains in efficiency and affordability, designers are starting to take on the next challenge in the evolution of solar technology: how to make it aesthetic, or at least inconspicuous. While many are solving that problem by integrating solar panels into poolside furniture and ladies undergarments, a consortium of designers in Japan are taking a more functional approach: solar leaves.While they don't seem to have the art of camouflage perfected quite yet (it looks like a bad silk ficus), these thin-film solar leaves are designed to blend into other foliage, grabbing maximum sunlight without spoiling your view. This prototype -- designed by Japan's National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Mitsubishi, and Tokki Corp -- gives us an idea of the wide variety of forms that thin-film technology is allowing solar systems to take. Each leaf on this solar power plant is coated with its own protective film that will allow it to stand up to the elements.[via Engadget]&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383533729/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/a-d.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[US gaining two new marine national parks]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3130</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:15 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3130</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: News, Polit-ecoPresident Bush, whether in a true conservation desire or a last ditch legacy making effort, is considering the designation of two massive ocean national monuments. There will be no brass plaques or statues, just a protected status for the two areas. The two areas being considered are the Central Pacific Islands, an area almost the size of Alaska (and larger than all the other National Parks combined) and the Northern Mariana Islands, including the Mariana Trench, the deepest part of the ocean. Both areas are in the Pacific Ocean. The Central Pacific Islands include American Samoa and are home to a variety of coral reef atolls. The Mariana Islands and Trench are in the western Pacific and the trench is the deepest recorded portion of the ocean thus far. Why is this important? It would be the largest area of ocean preserved to date for one thing. It would protect sea birds, turtles and coral in the areas, many of which could be threatened by things like fishing, mining and our history of poor environmental stewardship. The area are still relatively pristine and healthy and this would be an excellent opportunity to keep them that way. No matter the motivation, this would be a good thing for the Pacific Ocean. [Via Red, Green and Blue]&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383299491/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/us-.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: News, Polit-ecoPresident Bush, whether in a true conservation desire or a last ditch legacy making effort, is considering the designation of two massive ocean national monuments. There will be no brass plaques or statues, just a protected status for the two areas. The two areas being considered are the Central Pacific Islands, an area almost the size of Alaska (and larger than all the other National Parks combined) and the Northern Mariana Islands, including the Mariana Trench, the deepest part of the ocean. Both areas are in the Pacific Ocean. The Central Pacific Islands include American Samoa and are home to a variety of coral reef atolls. The Mariana Islands and Trench are in the western Pacific and the trench is the deepest recorded portion of the ocean thus far. Why is this important? It would be the largest area of ocean preserved to date for one thing. It would protect sea birds, turtles and coral in the areas, many of which could be threatened by things like fishing, mining and our history of poor environmental stewardship. The area are still relatively pristine and healthy and this would be an excellent opportunity to keep them that way. No matter the motivation, this would be a good thing for the Pacific Ocean. [Via Red, Green and Blue]&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383299491/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/us-.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bisphenol-A: Maybe not-so-safe after all]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3131</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:15 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3131</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Health, Kids and ParentingTwo weeks ago, the FDA declared bisphenol-A, a plasticizer used in some hard plastic food containers, including some baby bottles, safe, at least in the small amounts that leak out during use.However, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) begs to differ. The National Toxicology Program is a division of the National Institutes of Health. The National Toxicology Program has rated the chemical as a "three" or of "some concern" on a five-point scale, with five representing "very concerned."The NTP panel looked at the chemical's effects on reproduction and development, including looking at lab animal studies. While the FDA is the regulator of chemicals in food, it says it will take the NTP findings into account when it meets again this month to discuss bisphenol-A.What to do? Again, it's up to you. While bisphenol-A is found in many places, baby bottles might be the most disturbing. If you do need to use a baby bottle, there are plenty of bisphenol-A- free options out there. The choice is yours, for now.[Via Daily Green]Gallery: Breastfeeding gear ... besides the obviousGallery: GreenBaby: Feeding&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383253091/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/bis.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Health, Kids and ParentingTwo weeks ago, the FDA declared bisphenol-A, a plasticizer used in some hard plastic food containers, including some baby bottles, safe, at least in the small amounts that leak out during use.However, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) begs to differ. The National Toxicology Program is a division of the National Institutes of Health. The National Toxicology Program has rated the chemical as a "three" or of "some concern" on a five-point scale, with five representing "very concerned."The NTP panel looked at the chemical's effects on reproduction and development, including looking at lab animal studies. While the FDA is the regulator of chemicals in food, it says it will take the NTP findings into account when it meets again this month to discuss bisphenol-A.What to do? Again, it's up to you. While bisphenol-A is found in many places, baby bottles might be the most disturbing. If you do need to use a baby bottle, there are plenty of bisphenol-A- free options out there. The choice is yours, for now.[Via Daily Green]Gallery: Breastfeeding gear ... besides the obviousGallery: GreenBaby: Feeding&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383253091/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/bis.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Japan's solar ships]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3132</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:15 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3132</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Cars and Transportation, Alternative EnergyThe open ocean seems like a good place to harvest solar power - no buildings or trees to get in the way, just lots of open sky. Nippon Yusen KK and Nippon Oil, both of Japan, are planning to do just that on top of Toyota toting cargo ships. The companies plan to put a solar panel capable of generating 40 kilowatts of power on the 60,000 ton ship. A solar panel placed on a house generates something like 3.5 kilowatts. The panel could help to conserve 6.5% of the fuel oil the ship uses to power its diesel engines. Developers have to work to find solutions for potential damage from salt and vibrations on board the ship. They hope to have the first panels in place by December and commercial solution available in the next three to five years. The 6.5% savings doesn't seem like a lot, until you consider the scale of the operation. On a ship that large, a 6.5% savings on fuel oil is probably enough to run a fleet of the Toyotas it is carrying. [Via CleanTechnica]&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383212698/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/jap.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Cars and Transportation, Alternative EnergyThe open ocean seems like a good place to harvest solar power - no buildings or trees to get in the way, just lots of open sky. Nippon Yusen KK and Nippon Oil, both of Japan, are planning to do just that on top of Toyota toting cargo ships. The companies plan to put a solar panel capable of generating 40 kilowatts of power on the 60,000 ton ship. A solar panel placed on a house generates something like 3.5 kilowatts. The panel could help to conserve 6.5% of the fuel oil the ship uses to power its diesel engines. Developers have to work to find solutions for potential damage from salt and vibrations on board the ship. They hope to have the first panels in place by December and commercial solution available in the next three to five years. The 6.5% savings doesn't seem like a lot, until you consider the scale of the operation. On a ship that large, a 6.5% savings on fuel oil is probably enough to run a fleet of the Toyotas it is carrying. [Via CleanTechnica]&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383212698/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/jap.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hybrid wars: Honda revives the Insight]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3123</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:14 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3123</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Cars and TransportationHonda may have been the first major automaker to get a hybrid on the road here in the US, but when the Prius rolled out, sales of the less-practical 2-seater plummeted and Honda discontinued its production in 2006. Now, Honda's launching a renewed effort to break into the hybrid-only market, only this time with more... insight? Looking strikingly similar to the car the killed the original, Honda has released concept shots of the 2009 Insight.The new 5-door, five-seater model is Honda's attempt to wrestle a chunk of the market away from Toyota, and by the look of it, they might just give the Prius a run for its money. Not only is the new Insight more stylish and practical than its predecessor -- though sadly not as fuel efficient -- Honda has figured out a way to cut the cost of its hybrid drive system in half. Expected to make its debut in early 2009, the Insight will start at a very reasonable &#36;18,500. [via Autobloggreen]&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383452359/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/hyb.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Cars and TransportationHonda may have been the first major automaker to get a hybrid on the road here in the US, but when the Prius rolled out, sales of the less-practical 2-seater plummeted and Honda discontinued its production in 2006. Now, Honda's launching a renewed effort to break into the hybrid-only market, only this time with more... insight? Looking strikingly similar to the car the killed the original, Honda has released concept shots of the 2009 Insight.The new 5-door, five-seater model is Honda's attempt to wrestle a chunk of the market away from Toyota, and by the look of it, they might just give the Prius a run for its money. Not only is the new Insight more stylish and practical than its predecessor -- though sadly not as fuel efficient -- Honda has figured out a way to cut the cost of its hybrid drive system in half. Expected to make its debut in early 2009, the Insight will start at a very reasonable &#36;18,500. [via Autobloggreen]&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383452359/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/hyb.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PETA's striptease quiz]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3124</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:14 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3124</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Activism, Plants and Wildlife PETA has a new method for teaching dudes, and chicks who like chicks, the facts about Animal Birth Control. It's a 10 item quiz designed to raise awareness of animal reproduction issues, with questions like, "In six years, how many puppies can an unspayed dog and her litter produce?" Answer: a scary 60,000 puppies! Interesting information, right? But probably more interesting to some folks is that the lovely Amber, pictured above, takes off an item of clothing for every correct answer. She's wearing lacy red underwear, and yes, you can retake the questions you get wrong.&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383441463/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/pet.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Activism, Plants and Wildlife PETA has a new method for teaching dudes, and chicks who like chicks, the facts about Animal Birth Control. It's a 10 item quiz designed to raise awareness of animal reproduction issues, with questions like, "In six years, how many puppies can an unspayed dog and her litter produce?" Answer: a scary 60,000 puppies! Interesting information, right? But probably more interesting to some folks is that the lovely Amber, pictured above, takes off an item of clothing for every correct answer. She's wearing lacy red underwear, and yes, you can retake the questions you get wrong.&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383441463/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/pet.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[France bans TV aimed at children under age 3]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3125</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:14 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3125</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Kids and ParentingThere are lots of reasons to get rid of your television. TV can be a massive time waster, increase your "wants," and prevent you from doing things that are more worthwhile. This is especially true for children, who can even be afflicted with "Nature Deficit Disorder."Well, France's broadcast authority has banned French TV channels from marketing TV shows intended for children under the age of 3. They also ordered warning messages to be played on foreign baby channels such as Fox's BabyFirst TV. The warning messages read, "Watching television can slow the development of children under 3, even when it involves channels aimed specifically at them."The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends the following regarding TV and kids:<br />
<br />
    Limit all children's media time to no more than 1 to 2 hours per day.<br />
    No TVs in children's bedrooms!<br />
    "Discourage" TV viewing for children under age 2.<br />
    Monitor shows and discuss content.<br />
<br />
Not sure what I think about this French ban. Part of me thinks it's a great idea. But the other part of me thinks that if young children are going to watch TV, it would be better that they are watching something that is somewhat appropriate for them. What do you think?[Via Eco-child's Play]&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383430920/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/fra.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Kids and ParentingThere are lots of reasons to get rid of your television. TV can be a massive time waster, increase your "wants," and prevent you from doing things that are more worthwhile. This is especially true for children, who can even be afflicted with "Nature Deficit Disorder."Well, France's broadcast authority has banned French TV channels from marketing TV shows intended for children under the age of 3. They also ordered warning messages to be played on foreign baby channels such as Fox's BabyFirst TV. The warning messages read, "Watching television can slow the development of children under 3, even when it involves channels aimed specifically at them."The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends the following regarding TV and kids:<br />
<br />
    Limit all children's media time to no more than 1 to 2 hours per day.<br />
    No TVs in children's bedrooms!<br />
    "Discourage" TV viewing for children under age 2.<br />
    Monitor shows and discuss content.<br />
<br />
Not sure what I think about this French ban. Part of me thinks it's a great idea. But the other part of me thinks that if young children are going to watch TV, it would be better that they are watching something that is somewhat appropriate for them. What do you think?[Via Eco-child's Play]&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383430920/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/fra.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Would you ride to work if you got free showers?]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3126</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:14 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3126</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Cars and Transportation, Health, FitnessIf you happen to work in formal setting where appearance is paramount, riding your bike to work can be a tricky affair. You can stash your dry cleaning in the break room, but what do you do about your sweaty, stinky funk when you walk into the office? You could try Earthfirst's tips for freshening up after a ride. Or, if you happen to live in south London, you can stop off at the local Holiday Inn and take a free shower. The Holiday Inn and the Sutton Town Centre have teamed up for a six month pilot program that allows anyone employed by a member of the Sutton Town Centre Business Network to rinse off after their morning ride -- BYO soap, shampoo, and towel. Just swipe your electronic key card and you're ready to get your clean on. It's all part of a plan to encourage Sutton-area employees to green their commute. Will it work? Doubt it, but it will be nicer for those who decide to ride or run -- not to mention those who work beside them.[via AutoBlogGreen]&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383408109/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/wou.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Cars and Transportation, Health, FitnessIf you happen to work in formal setting where appearance is paramount, riding your bike to work can be a tricky affair. You can stash your dry cleaning in the break room, but what do you do about your sweaty, stinky funk when you walk into the office? You could try Earthfirst's tips for freshening up after a ride. Or, if you happen to live in south London, you can stop off at the local Holiday Inn and take a free shower. The Holiday Inn and the Sutton Town Centre have teamed up for a six month pilot program that allows anyone employed by a member of the Sutton Town Centre Business Network to rinse off after their morning ride -- BYO soap, shampoo, and towel. Just swipe your electronic key card and you're ready to get your clean on. It's all part of a plan to encourage Sutton-area employees to green their commute. Will it work? Doubt it, but it will be nicer for those who decide to ride or run -- not to mention those who work beside them.[via AutoBlogGreen]&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383408109/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/wou.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Towels and peer pressure and less laundry for hotels]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3127</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:14 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3127</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Travel and VacationIf you've stayed in a hotel recently you have most likely seen the signs in the bathroom that suggest you hang up your towel if you'd like to reuse it. A study from the Journal of Consumer Research suggests the wording on that sign is the key to how you behave. If the sign suggests you join your fellow guests in reusing your towel to save water, 44% of us will decide its a good idea. If however, the sign suggests you hang up your towel to save water and protect the environment, without mentioning what others do, only 35% of us will hang up our towels. Apparently we're still susceptible to peer pressure, even when it comes to towels. [Via ecoscraps]&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383382312/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/tow.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Travel and VacationIf you've stayed in a hotel recently you have most likely seen the signs in the bathroom that suggest you hang up your towel if you'd like to reuse it. A study from the Journal of Consumer Research suggests the wording on that sign is the key to how you behave. If the sign suggests you join your fellow guests in reusing your towel to save water, 44% of us will decide its a good idea. If however, the sign suggests you hang up your towel to save water and protect the environment, without mentioning what others do, only 35% of us will hang up our towels. Apparently we're still susceptible to peer pressure, even when it comes to towels. [Via ecoscraps]&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383382312/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/tow.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Netherlands readies for rising sea levels]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3128</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:14 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3128</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Local, Climate ChangeIn a country where 60% of the population lives below today's sea level, the prospect of rising seas has to give everyone the cold shivers. Literally translated, the Netherlands means the "low countries" and much of its land area -- about 20% -- was reclaimed by an elaborate system of dikes, levees, and those famous windmills. Now, after finally taming much of the flood dangers that have plagued its low-lying cities, global warming has to come muck it all up.New studies show that the Netherlands are facing a 1.3 meter rising in sea level over the next century. That means the Dutch have to both build up their 350km of coastline while at the same time dredge out canals and build up dikes. In financial terms, that means they need to invest about &#36;2.9B annually for the next few decades to have a fighting chance of keeping their cities -- which produce 65% of the nation's income -- above water. Authorities have recommended a long term independent "Delta Fund" -- feed by natural gas income and state bonds -- to pay for the seemingly endless building project.Gallery: Holding Back the Sea&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383321042/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/the.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Local, Climate ChangeIn a country where 60% of the population lives below today's sea level, the prospect of rising seas has to give everyone the cold shivers. Literally translated, the Netherlands means the "low countries" and much of its land area -- about 20% -- was reclaimed by an elaborate system of dikes, levees, and those famous windmills. Now, after finally taming much of the flood dangers that have plagued its low-lying cities, global warming has to come muck it all up.New studies show that the Netherlands are facing a 1.3 meter rising in sea level over the next century. That means the Dutch have to both build up their 350km of coastline while at the same time dredge out canals and build up dikes. In financial terms, that means they need to invest about &#36;2.9B annually for the next few decades to have a fighting chance of keeping their cities -- which produce 65% of the nation's income -- above water. Authorities have recommended a long term independent "Delta Fund" -- feed by natural gas income and state bonds -- to pay for the seemingly endless building project.Gallery: Holding Back the Sea&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383321042/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/the.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Huge EU power grid could power 70 million home]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3120</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:13 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3120</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Alternative EnergyAt this point they're still at the planning stages, but this proposed transnational power grid, designed by Greenpeace, is pretty ambitious. The basic idea: connect 10,000 wind turbines from over 100 different wind farms in seven countries scattered around the North Sea. That's a lot of wind farms, countries and distances to figure out, but if successful, this shared renewable energy could power 70 million European homes.The idea of using a massive grid to share wind-generated energy could take care of that pesky problems with wind-power - it's not always windy. By having a grid to share power, a windy day in Scotland can off-set a still day in Germany. There would also be supplements of energy from Scandinavian hydro power.The plans have been called "ambitious but realistic" by senior official types and I'm guessing these big projects are going to get more popular as the EU tries to meet their 20-20-20 plan (cut 20% of greenhouse gases, get 20% of primary energy from renewables, and knock 20% off of energy use - all by 2020).&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383533726/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/hug.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Alternative EnergyAt this point they're still at the planning stages, but this proposed transnational power grid, designed by Greenpeace, is pretty ambitious. The basic idea: connect 10,000 wind turbines from over 100 different wind farms in seven countries scattered around the North Sea. That's a lot of wind farms, countries and distances to figure out, but if successful, this shared renewable energy could power 70 million European homes.The idea of using a massive grid to share wind-generated energy could take care of that pesky problems with wind-power - it's not always windy. By having a grid to share power, a windy day in Scotland can off-set a still day in Germany. There would also be supplements of energy from Scandinavian hydro power.The plans have been called "ambitious but realistic" by senior official types and I'm guessing these big projects are going to get more popular as the EU tries to meet their 20-20-20 plan (cut 20% of greenhouse gases, get 20% of primary energy from renewables, and knock 20% off of energy use - all by 2020).&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383533726/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/hug.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[School bus driver circles Brooklyn for 5 hours]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3121</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:13 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3121</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Cars and Transportation, ActivismNext to getting stuck in bumper to bumper traffic -- which is definitely one of the most rage-provoking ways to waste gas and spew CO2 -- the second most annoying way to burn up all of your fuel is to get lost. Not only do you feel like an idiot for not consulting a map before you set out, but you have to watch that needle on your gas gauge count down towards 'E.' Now, imagine the pressure you'd feel if you were lost for 5 hours and you were driving a bus load of school children. That's right, after picking up about a dozen first graders and kindergartners from the Achievement First Brownsville Charter School, a Brooklyn bus driver 'got lost' and circled the borough for a grand total of 5 hours. When police finally apprehended the wayward driver, they arrested him. Not for wasting tons of diesel fuel -- though that might please some of us -- but for just being dangerously weird. I guess we may never know what he was thinking, or why he refused to stop and get directions, but I have a well thought-out theory: he's one of these energy-waster activists, here to destroy the planet.&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383510422/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/sch.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Cars and Transportation, ActivismNext to getting stuck in bumper to bumper traffic -- which is definitely one of the most rage-provoking ways to waste gas and spew CO2 -- the second most annoying way to burn up all of your fuel is to get lost. Not only do you feel like an idiot for not consulting a map before you set out, but you have to watch that needle on your gas gauge count down towards 'E.' Now, imagine the pressure you'd feel if you were lost for 5 hours and you were driving a bus load of school children. That's right, after picking up about a dozen first graders and kindergartners from the Achievement First Brownsville Charter School, a Brooklyn bus driver 'got lost' and circled the borough for a grand total of 5 hours. When police finally apprehended the wayward driver, they arrested him. Not for wasting tons of diesel fuel -- though that might please some of us -- but for just being dangerously weird. I guess we may never know what he was thinking, or why he refused to stop and get directions, but I have a well thought-out theory: he's one of these energy-waster activists, here to destroy the planet.&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383510422/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/sch.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Storms like Gustav, getting stronger, due to warming oceans]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3122</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:13 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3122</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: NewsSo, is a warming globe responsible for stronger storms, such as Hurricane Gustav? Yes, says climate scientist James Elsner, of Florida State, in an interview with Reuters this week. According to Elsner, as the ocean gets warmer, the strongest tropical storms get stronger. Elsner expects stronger storms in the future if the seas continue to warm.After looking at 26 years of data, scientists concluded that it was the strongest storms that got stronger as a result of increasing ocean warmth, in a "survival-of-the-fittest" argument. These results are in line with projections made by the U.N. IPCC, which has said that there may be more intense storms in the future due to global warming, and that this is more likely than not due to human activities. However, Elsner's study made no reference to any human causes for warming oceans. &nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383478124/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/sto.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: NewsSo, is a warming globe responsible for stronger storms, such as Hurricane Gustav? Yes, says climate scientist James Elsner, of Florida State, in an interview with Reuters this week. According to Elsner, as the ocean gets warmer, the strongest tropical storms get stronger. Elsner expects stronger storms in the future if the seas continue to warm.After looking at 26 years of data, scientists concluded that it was the strongest storms that got stronger as a result of increasing ocean warmth, in a "survival-of-the-fittest" argument. These results are in line with projections made by the U.N. IPCC, which has said that there may be more intense storms in the future due to global warming, and that this is more likely than not due to human activities. However, Elsner's study made no reference to any human causes for warming oceans. &nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383478124/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/sto.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The RNC is BPA-free]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3118</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:11 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3118</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Food, Health, Polit-ecoAs a member of the media covering life beyond the perimeter of the Republican National Convention at Saint Paul's XCel Center I can't tell you whether the metal detectors, video monitors or hairspray being used is environmentally-friendly. But I can tell you some of the swag disagrees with the FDA on BPA. That is, the Food and Drug Administration earlier stated that Bisphenol A had not been linked to cancer, and was exposure to it in plastics did not warrant health concerns. The official Republican National Convention give-away water bottle, however, if BPA-free. The containers are made from #1 plastic, completely recyclable. The jug also proudly announces it is BPA-free. Get yours in red or blue, but only if you know someone inside the fence that can cross the border. Me? I'm waiting for these puppies to go on sale on eBay, just like Alaska's state jet.&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383625880/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/the.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Food, Health, Polit-ecoAs a member of the media covering life beyond the perimeter of the Republican National Convention at Saint Paul's XCel Center I can't tell you whether the metal detectors, video monitors or hairspray being used is environmentally-friendly. But I can tell you some of the swag disagrees with the FDA on BPA. That is, the Food and Drug Administration earlier stated that Bisphenol A had not been linked to cancer, and was exposure to it in plastics did not warrant health concerns. The official Republican National Convention give-away water bottle, however, if BPA-free. The containers are made from #1 plastic, completely recyclable. The jug also proudly announces it is BPA-free. Get yours in red or blue, but only if you know someone inside the fence that can cross the border. Me? I'm waiting for these puppies to go on sale on eBay, just like Alaska's state jet.&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383625880/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/the.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Green products you shouldn't waste your money buying]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3119</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:18:11 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3119</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Shopping Guide, TipsHere at Green Daily we spend a lot of time telling you about all the options for new green products. Things you can buy or check out to reduce your carbon footprint, create less trash and more. But what about green products that just aren't worth the cost? Smart Money came up with a list of what to avoid. Read on to get the info.<br />
<br />
    OLED televisions (organic light emitting diode) have super thin screens and and use 40% less energy than LCD televisions. The problem? OLEDs are so new they cost a lot and its hard to tell if you are getting a good one. And the thin screens don't come with any guarantees they will hold up. Sony's 11 inch XEL-1 costs &#36;2,500. Seems like a good reason to wait to me!<br />
    Some "organic" products at the grocery store. With studies showing that some organics are not more nutritious and labels that can be misleading, it's not always the best idea to buy organic. Some places sell "organic" seafood when the FDA has no organic certification for seafood.   <br />
    Hormone free labeled poultry, pork and eggs can be misleading. The FDA already requires these foods to be hormone free so if a company is charging a premium price for foods labeled that way, you're not getting anything out of the ordinary.   <br />
    Carbon offsets - a nice idea but with no government regulations it's hard to say how far your contribution is going.   <br />
    Organic wine and spirits may help prevent a hangover the next day but might not be a good green investment. For example, a wine made with organic grapes can still have plenty of additives included in the winemaking process. And, it won't last as long on the shelf so aging an organic wine can turn it into vinegar.   <br />
    Green building is all the rage right now with everything going towards LEED certifications. That's all well and good if you have lots of money to spend or are staying put for a long time. But if you spend thousands of dollars on solar panels now and won't recoup that money in energy savings for at least 10 years it isn't a good investment for you. Focus on things with a quicker return like energy efficient appliances and more insulation in your home. <br />
<br />
[Via Smart Money]&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383580662/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/gre.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Shopping Guide, TipsHere at Green Daily we spend a lot of time telling you about all the options for new green products. Things you can buy or check out to reduce your carbon footprint, create less trash and more. But what about green products that just aren't worth the cost? Smart Money came up with a list of what to avoid. Read on to get the info.<br />
<br />
    OLED televisions (organic light emitting diode) have super thin screens and and use 40% less energy than LCD televisions. The problem? OLEDs are so new they cost a lot and its hard to tell if you are getting a good one. And the thin screens don't come with any guarantees they will hold up. Sony's 11 inch XEL-1 costs &#36;2,500. Seems like a good reason to wait to me!<br />
    Some "organic" products at the grocery store. With studies showing that some organics are not more nutritious and labels that can be misleading, it's not always the best idea to buy organic. Some places sell "organic" seafood when the FDA has no organic certification for seafood.   <br />
    Hormone free labeled poultry, pork and eggs can be misleading. The FDA already requires these foods to be hormone free so if a company is charging a premium price for foods labeled that way, you're not getting anything out of the ordinary.   <br />
    Carbon offsets - a nice idea but with no government regulations it's hard to say how far your contribution is going.   <br />
    Organic wine and spirits may help prevent a hangover the next day but might not be a good green investment. For example, a wine made with organic grapes can still have plenty of additives included in the winemaking process. And, it won't last as long on the shelf so aging an organic wine can turn it into vinegar.   <br />
    Green building is all the rage right now with everything going towards LEED certifications. That's all well and good if you have lots of money to spend or are staying put for a long time. But if you spend thousands of dollars on solar panels now and won't recoup that money in energy savings for at least 10 years it isn't a good investment for you. Focus on things with a quicker return like energy efficient appliances and more insulation in your home. <br />
<br />
[Via Smart Money]&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/383580662/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/04/gre.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dude, you just ate a clone burger!]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3113</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:06:32 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3113</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Food, HealthIn news that's sure to make some of you meatatarians out there a little uneasy, rumor has it that unless you've been buying organic, you may have theoretically already eaten products from a cloned animal. In January, the USFDA removed the ban on meat and milk from cloned animals, which means its probably already out there somewhere -- lurking on a supermarket shelf.According to the FDA, there's no reason to worry -- since it's "impossible to differentiate" between products from cloned animals, their offspring, and conventionally bred animals. However, if you are worried, the FDA says don't freak out yet, because very few of the cloned animals have reached the parenting age. Gee, that's comforting, right? Surprisingly, a few of the major meat companies that people love to hate, including Tyson Foods Inc., have policies against cloned animal products.Despite the fact that no evidence has been found to suggest that eating cloned animal products will screw up our immune systems or DNA, I bet you don't find too many takers when offer your friends a finger lickin' good clone burger, hot off the grill.&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/382492703/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/03/dud.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Food, HealthIn news that's sure to make some of you meatatarians out there a little uneasy, rumor has it that unless you've been buying organic, you may have theoretically already eaten products from a cloned animal. In January, the USFDA removed the ban on meat and milk from cloned animals, which means its probably already out there somewhere -- lurking on a supermarket shelf.According to the FDA, there's no reason to worry -- since it's "impossible to differentiate" between products from cloned animals, their offspring, and conventionally bred animals. However, if you are worried, the FDA says don't freak out yet, because very few of the cloned animals have reached the parenting age. Gee, that's comforting, right? Surprisingly, a few of the major meat companies that people love to hate, including Tyson Foods Inc., have policies against cloned animal products.Despite the fact that no evidence has been found to suggest that eating cloned animal products will screw up our immune systems or DNA, I bet you don't find too many takers when offer your friends a finger lickin' good clone burger, hot off the grill.&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/382492703/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/03/dud.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Silver lining: Global warming may reduce cases of the plague in the US]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3114</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:06:32 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3114</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Health, Climate ChangeAs greenhouse gases continue to wreak havoc on the earth's atmosphere, it may be difficult at times for even the most disgustingly positive, glass half-full types to find reasons for optimism. Well, here's one: scientists in Norway believe that a warmer and drier western United States will reduce if not eliminate cases of the Black Plague. Yes, I'm referring to the "Black Death" that decimated Europe in the Middle Ages, it apparently still lurks around the western half of the US.Since 1950, the western states have experienced 430 cases of the vile plague, the number of cases shifting dramatically from year to year. Researchers have found that cases seem to correspond with Pacific cooling anomalies -- which drive weather systems. Since the plague is spread through rats, or more specifically fleas that live on rats, warm and wet conditions bring more cases of the Black Death. As climate change continues to turn the west into a super dry convection oven, the rat and flea populations are expected to go into decline. Hooray -- sort of.&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/382403589/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/03/sil.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Health, Climate ChangeAs greenhouse gases continue to wreak havoc on the earth's atmosphere, it may be difficult at times for even the most disgustingly positive, glass half-full types to find reasons for optimism. Well, here's one: scientists in Norway believe that a warmer and drier western United States will reduce if not eliminate cases of the Black Plague. Yes, I'm referring to the "Black Death" that decimated Europe in the Middle Ages, it apparently still lurks around the western half of the US.Since 1950, the western states have experienced 430 cases of the vile plague, the number of cases shifting dramatically from year to year. Researchers have found that cases seem to correspond with Pacific cooling anomalies -- which drive weather systems. Since the plague is spread through rats, or more specifically fleas that live on rats, warm and wet conditions bring more cases of the Black Death. As climate change continues to turn the west into a super dry convection oven, the rat and flea populations are expected to go into decline. Hooray -- sort of.&nbsp;Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/382403589/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/03/sil.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Pangea Egyptian Geranium with Adzuki Bean &amp;#x26; Cranberry Facial Scrub]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3115</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:06:32 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3115</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Celebrities, Natural Body CareWith fans like Christy Turlington and Gwyneth Paltrow, you can be pretty sure that  Pangea Egyptian Geranium with Adzuki Bean &amp; Cranberry Facial Scrub is organic and cruelty free. You could be forgiven if you also expect it to make you better at downward dog and cobra poses.The ingredients are free from GMO's, parabens, petroleum products, paraffins and any synthetic or harmful ingredients and are 100% vegetarian. The company also has an admirable approach to packaging. It's all infused with seeds and can be planted in your garden. Yes, really, all of it!And what about the scrub? It's an exfoliant, which will always be somewhat irritating to sensitive skin -- I mean, after all, you're scraping off dead skin cells. But the main ingredients, cranberry, adzuki and geranium are relatively soothing, and you have to admit it smells amazing. As always, if you have a history of sensitive skin, you're probably better off finding a local spa or salon that stocks Pangea so that you can do a spot test before shelling out &#36;32 for a full size tube.&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/382377737/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/03/pan.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Celebrities, Natural Body CareWith fans like Christy Turlington and Gwyneth Paltrow, you can be pretty sure that  Pangea Egyptian Geranium with Adzuki Bean &amp; Cranberry Facial Scrub is organic and cruelty free. You could be forgiven if you also expect it to make you better at downward dog and cobra poses.The ingredients are free from GMO's, parabens, petroleum products, paraffins and any synthetic or harmful ingredients and are 100% vegetarian. The company also has an admirable approach to packaging. It's all infused with seeds and can be planted in your garden. Yes, really, all of it!And what about the scrub? It's an exfoliant, which will always be somewhat irritating to sensitive skin -- I mean, after all, you're scraping off dead skin cells. But the main ingredients, cranberry, adzuki and geranium are relatively soothing, and you have to admit it smells amazing. As always, if you have a history of sensitive skin, you're probably better off finding a local spa or salon that stocks Pangea so that you can do a spot test before shelling out &#36;32 for a full size tube.&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/382377737/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/03/pan.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Worldmapper: Reinventing the map from a ecological perspective]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3116</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:06:32 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3116</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Green by the NumbersCarbon Emissions<br />
They say that some people are auditory learners and others are hands-on. Well, this tool is perfect for people who absorb information best when they see it expressed visually -- like me. It's called Worldmapper and it's an online catalog of maps that re-imagines the globe based on factors like population, resources, pollution, and even municipal garbage collection.If you're the kind of person who gets excited over cartography, or sometimes spends over an hour looking at things on Google Earth, you're probably going to want to spend a couple of minutes searching for which countries have the greatest water supply or largest recycling programs. These maps explore other factors as well, like violence, education, wealth, and nuclear weapons stockpiles.You might be surprised by how many of these maps don't match up with your expectations. The greenhouse emissions map shows the Europe almost tied with US for the title of greatest emitter. Of course, the map only includes data current to the year 2000, which is probably woefully inaccurate now. We also know that as of 2008, China would be slightly larger than the US on the CO2 map. Brazil and Australia would both be substantially larger as well.[via Inhabitat]&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/382324691/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/03/wor.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Green by the NumbersCarbon Emissions<br />
They say that some people are auditory learners and others are hands-on. Well, this tool is perfect for people who absorb information best when they see it expressed visually -- like me. It's called Worldmapper and it's an online catalog of maps that re-imagines the globe based on factors like population, resources, pollution, and even municipal garbage collection.If you're the kind of person who gets excited over cartography, or sometimes spends over an hour looking at things on Google Earth, you're probably going to want to spend a couple of minutes searching for which countries have the greatest water supply or largest recycling programs. These maps explore other factors as well, like violence, education, wealth, and nuclear weapons stockpiles.You might be surprised by how many of these maps don't match up with your expectations. The greenhouse emissions map shows the Europe almost tied with US for the title of greatest emitter. Of course, the map only includes data current to the year 2000, which is probably woefully inaccurate now. We also know that as of 2008, China would be slightly larger than the US on the CO2 map. Brazil and Australia would both be substantially larger as well.[via Inhabitat]&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/382324691/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/03/wor.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Green Blog Tour: CFLs and Body Sugar Edition]]></title>
			<link>http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3117</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:06:32 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeblueteardrops.com/showthread.php?tid=3117</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Green Blog TourCFLs: Risk vs. reward Su Avasthi over at Lime makes a big decision to go back to incandescent light bulbs after a scary incident. When reaching over to check a CFL in her bedside lamp, the bulb shattered, spewing glass shards, a white powder and mercury, all over the bed stand, pillows and bed.To learn how to dispose of burned-out and shattered CFLs, see here. You'll want to read the whole article, but one important tip is to remember to open the windows and leave the room for 15 minutes to avoid exposure to any gaseous mercury after a CFL breaks.Why changing your lightbulbs doesn't matter Hank Green on eco-geek is sick of the "Change your lightbulbs" campaign. Why? Hank claims that asking people to make changes to save the planet falls flat. Tell them how much money they'll save, give them a better lightbulb instead. Then you'll see action.Body Sugaring: Natural, green hair removal Stephanie at Eco-chick tells us all about body sugaring, a method of hair removal that has been used for thousands of years. Body sugar is a paste made of sugar, lemon juice, honey or molasses, which you then apply, let dry, and remove in strips. Check out her post for more, including a review of body sugaring in general and Parissa Body Sugar.&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/382270213/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/03/gre.../#comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Filed under: Green Blog TourCFLs: Risk vs. reward Su Avasthi over at Lime makes a big decision to go back to incandescent light bulbs after a scary incident. When reaching over to check a CFL in her bedside lamp, the bulb shattered, spewing glass shards, a white powder and mercury, all over the bed stand, pillows and bed.To learn how to dispose of burned-out and shattered CFLs, see here. You'll want to read the whole article, but one important tip is to remember to open the windows and leave the room for 15 minutes to avoid exposure to any gaseous mercury after a CFL breaks.Why changing your lightbulbs doesn't matter Hank Green on eco-geek is sick of the "Change your lightbulbs" campaign. Why? Hank claims that asking people to make changes to save the planet falls flat. Tell them how much money they'll save, give them a better lightbulb instead. Then you'll see action.Body Sugaring: Natural, green hair removal Stephanie at Eco-chick tells us all about body sugaring, a method of hair removal that has been used for thousands of years. Body sugar is a paste made of sugar, lemon juice, honey or molasses, which you then apply, let dry, and remove in strips. Check out her post for more, including a review of body sugaring in general and Parissa Body Sugar.&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted at http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenDaily/~3/382270213/<br />
Comments: http://www.greendaily.com/2008/09/03/gre.../#comments]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>